Supreme Court Grants Bail to K. Kavitha in Alleged Liquor Scam
In a significant legal development, K. Kavitha, a leader of the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS), has been granted bail by the Supreme Court in connection with the alleged Delhi liquor policy scam. This ruling comes as a major relief for Kavitha, who has faced accusations related to a money laundering case linked to the purported scam.
Details of the Case
The Supreme Court’s decision to grant bail was influenced by several critical factors. The court noted that the evidence in the case has already been presented and that the charge sheet has been filed. Kavitha’s lawyer, Mukul Rohatgi, argued her case effectively, emphasizing that his client poses no flight risk as she is an elected party leader and has strong political ties. He asserted, “She is not going anywhere,” highlighting her status and commitment to participating in the legal proceedings.
Legal Proceedings and Arguments
The hearing was conducted by a bench comprising Justices B.R. Gawai and K.V. Vishwanathan. Rohatgi presented arguments insisting that the investigation in both the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) cases has been completed. He referenced the case’s extensive documentation which includes testimony from 493 witnesses and a staggering 50,000 pages of evidence. Furthermore, he pointed out that other high-profile individuals, including former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia, have received bail in similar cases.
Addressing concerns about her influence and potential to flee, Rohatgi insisted that Kavitha is an active Member of Legislative Council (MLC), rendering her a low flight risk. He also mentioned that comments made by the High Court, stating that she would not receive relief simply because she is an ‘influential woman,’ should not influence the current proceedings.
The Court’s Observations
Justice Gawai, in a light-hearted moment, remarked that since Kavitha is an elected official, she understands the boundaries of right and wrong, exhibiting confidence in her adherence to justice. Mukul Rohatgi countered allegations stating that Kavitha was involved in intimidation against witnesses, asserting no concrete evidence supports such claims.
During the proceedings, the Additional Solicitor General (ASG) S.V. Raju raised concerns about Kavitha’s behavior, implying that her actions suggested tampering with evidence and witness intimidation by allegedly destroying a phone. Rohatgi responded with an explanation regarding the ownership of the device, maintaining that it was handed over to his employee, thus denying any wrongdoing on Kavitha’s part.
Conclusion and Ongoing Developments
This ruling is indicative of the ongoing legal battles surrounding the alleged liquor policy scandal, which has seen prominent political figures embroiled in controversy. As the Supreme Court deliberates further, K. Kavitha’s situation remains dynamic, and updates will continue to unfold as the case progresses.
Story Developing…
